I am convinced that no scenario exists in which this nation
will move ahead on even the slightest regulation on guns. It cannot be done. What else has to happen? The largest massacre in the history of Oregon
will be forgotten by Monday. A five
month old got shot in a drive by shooting here in Cleveland yesterday. How much worse can you get? Gun regulation opponents will not move an
inch from their position of “If we even admit there is a problem, we have lost”. What would it take? Teams of armed goons spraying Disneyland with
machine gun fire? Roving gangs of firing
squads? It’s insane. At this point when a 24 year old sexually
repressed white kid shoots up a bunch of innocent people, I hardly even
notice. That’s a problem.
The logic of the gun lobby is so completely flawed it is
laughable. Let’s go point by point…
Guns don’t kill people,
people kill people. Yes, people with guns. I can’t recall the last time a 5 month old
baby got killed in a “drive by knifing”.
It’s not a gun issue,
it’s a mental health issue. We can’t
prevent mental health problems, but we can prevent mentally ill people from
getting guns, hence eliminating the problem of mentally ill people shooting 40
people at a school.
Most gun owners are
responsible, so they shouldn’t be punished because some kooks go crazy with
guns. I can comfortably drive 130
mph in my car, but I’m not allowed to drive 130 mph in my car because your
dipshit sister-in-law can’t control her vehicle at 55 mph much less 130. Being in a society means we have to cater to
the lowest common denominator. Yeah, it
sucks that I can’t go 130 mph because your fucking sister-in-law can’t drive,
but that’s the way it is. My pal Leo can
take a bunch of LSD and have a great time, but Sally from the college jumped
off the roof of her dorm so now none of us are allowed to do LSD. It’s the way society works. We have to cater to the people that don’t
have their shit together.
But the Constitution
says… The Constitution is a document
written in the 1700s when the Founding Fathers weren’t too concerned about a
disgruntled white kid showing up at a movie theater with an Uzi. However, they were wise enough to realize
that society would change and to allow for that they created the idea of the “amendment”. We got rid of socially destructive situations
like slavery and women not being able to vote.
I think we can come up with a workable gun policy.
The only thing that
stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun. The idea of arming everyone to prevent gun
violence is so stupid it defies all logic.
I am not really interested in living in a society where any disagreement
can rapidly devolve into a gunfight because everyone is “packing”. Let’s try arming every drunk asshole at an
NFL Stadium this Sunday and see how this model works out. I will be home in my safe room. Tell me how it goes.
I need a gun to
protect my family. Let’s be
honest. If you were focused on
protecting your family, you would probably buy really tricked out doors and badass
window locks. You’d dig a moat. Buy some alligators to toss in it. That’s not really as fun as a bunch of guns,
is it? This idea of being some domestic
Jason Bourne is ludicrous. Every responsible gun owner claims their guns are in a safe. How does one get their guns from a safe during one of these feared home invasions that are right around the corner? “Hold everything you sons of bitches! I’m running downstairs to the basement gun safe
and I will be right back! Don’t you
move!”
If the guns are
regulated, the only ones that can get guns are criminals. If we are trying to prevent mass shootings
caused by mentally ill white dudes in their 20s, wouldn’t it logically cut down
the chance of these incidents happening if the mentally ill white dude (that is
always a loner) has to navigate the criminal underground to buy himself a gun? Also, if only criminals and police have guns,
wouldn’t we then be leaving the gunplay to the pros? I’m good with that. How about I sing stupid songs on stage and
criminals and cops shoot at each other? The
deal would be that cops and meth dealers can’t sing “Gloria” at any jam night
or karaoke bar. That’s a “win” for
society.
Armed civilians are
the only way to keep the government from totalitarianism. While folks like to play militia much like
other folks like to do Civil War recreations, these are both fantasies. A backwoods militia is as real as a Renaissance Faire. (note olde timey spelling) Let’s say the government goes crazy and the
president declares himself “dictator for life”.
The same armed forces that blew up the Iraqi army in about 23 minutes
would then have to tangle with “Jim and Ray from outside Terre Haute”? I’m putting on my money on the $431 trillion
dollar government war machine instead of the 17 guys with assault rifles.
None of what I think matters though. Common sense has no application in this
situation. In a few days this will blow
over. The NRA and other lobby groups
will do their thing. Congress will
gridlock. The clock will start ticking
until the next crazy tragic situation. Years
from now people will look back at this and marvel at the stupidity of our
society. We clearly need to do something. Anything. What we are doing now is not working. That cannot be debated.
Perhaps we as a society just need to see if we can solve one small problem. Maybe we need to first all pull together in something we can all agree on. Maybe we need to see of we can tackle one tangible issue and have some success. Perhaps some momentum could be gained if we righted at least one wrong. All of us unified in a common goal we all know is important. Tell me this...
What is the status of the One Direction wallet?